
Key Points
- Pi Network Bot Activity Allegations Shake CoinMarketCap Poll
- Pi Network’s sentiment poll on CoinMarketCap plunged 90% in a day.
- Users suspect bot activity due to an unusually high number of negative votes.
- Other platforms like CoinGecko show a largely positive sentiment.
- No concrete proof exists, but past vote brigading fuels speculation.
Pi Network’s supporters are raising alarms over a sudden and dramatic drop in their token’s community sentiment score on CoinMarketCap. In less than 24 hours, the sentiment rating reportedly fell by 90%, with over 1.94 million votes—more than Bitcoin’s.
This sparked allegations that bots were used to manipulate the poll, as Pi Network’s sentiment remains overwhelmingly positive on other platforms like CoinGecko. A Pi Network supporter voiced concerns on social media, stating:
Hello @CoinMarketCap I want you guys to confirm something for me.
It looks like somebody is using bots to vote against $PI.
I am 99% sure this is not an organic poll.
Over 1.94 Million votes is even bigger than the $BTC votes.Kindly check and confirm. #PiNetwork pic.twitter.com/nKP1647qaW
— MOON JEFF 🪐 (@CRYPTOAD00) March 19, 2025
The accusations stem from the unusually high number of votes and the fact that only CoinMarketCap’s sentiment changed so drastically. Some in the community believe this is a targeted attack against Pi Network, which has faced significant criticism and price instability in recent weeks.
This is not the first time questionable voting or rating tactics have been reported in the crypto space. Recently, the Ross Token rug pull sparked a $7 million scandal, highlighting how online sentiment and trust can be easily manipulated in Web3 projects.
Just compare the difference.
77% of the $PI community is bullish on coingecko.
Why is it so different on Coinmarket?
Somebody is playing with the numbers. #PiNetwork https://t.co/seJPoBGoiq pic.twitter.com/PFTAyeVTYS— MOON JEFF 🪐 (@CRYPTOAD00) March 19, 2025
Is There Proof of Bot Activity?
Despite the strong suspicions, there is no definitive evidence that bots were responsible for the negative votes. However, the rapid pace of voting and the isolated nature of the event on a single platform raise questions.
Several factors complicate the situation:
- Pi Network’s Controversial Reputation: The project has been accused of lacking transparency, leading to skepticism from the broader crypto community.
- CoinMarketCap’s History with Pi: The platform initially refused to list Pi among the top tokens, causing friction between Pi supporters and CoinMarketCap.
- Vote Brigading by Pi Community: In the past, Pi supporters have mobilized en masse to sway ratings and reviews, such as review-bombing Bybit and Binance when they delayed Pi listings.
Pi Community Sentiment Plummets. Source: Moon Jeff – Techtoken
Given Pi Network’s history of both strong community support and external criticism, it’s difficult to say whether this drop was the result of organic sentiment or external interference.
The crypto market has been facing several trust issues lately. For instance, MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin debt crisis has raised fears of a BTC selloff, while Ethereum’s price struggles continue due to decreasing whale activity. These events show how sentiment can shift rapidly due to external factors.
Something is very wrong with this @CoinMarketCap‘s $PI community sentiment.
In just one day it dropped from 90$ to below 10%.
There is no way that can happen organically.We will attack tomorrow. $PI community is too big to mess with. #PiNetwork pic.twitter.com/jt9zsltX34
— MOON JEFF 🪐 (@CRYPTOAD00) March 19, 2025
Pi Network’s History of Vote Brigading
One reason some remain skeptical of the bot attack claims is that Pi Network’s community has a known history of aggressively influencing online polls and ratings.
For example, when Bybit’s CEO publicly criticized Pi Network, Pi supporters retaliated by review-bombing the Bybit app, significantly lowering its rating. A similar incident occurred with Binance after the exchange delayed Pi’s listing, leading to a flood of negative reviews.
This history raises a critical question—was this truly a bot attack, or was it a coordinated effort by Pi Network’s critics?
Crypto controversies are not new, and legal action is often the next step in high-profile disputes. Just recently, the Libra lawsuit saw Burwick Law taking legal action against Meteora and others over alleged fraud. If Pi Network’s allegations gain traction, it wouldn’t be surprising to see legal scrutiny over CoinMarketCap’s voting system.
For now, the debate continues, with Pi Network supporters calling for CoinMarketCap to investigate the incident and ensure fair voting practices.