Key Points
- Cardano Community defends Charles Hoskinson after harsh attacks.
- Critics label Hoskinson a problem, but many strongly disagree.
- Hoskinson addresses criticism, highlighting the toxicity on X.
- Cardano’s governance model aims for decentralization and unity.
The Cardano Community has once again come to the defense of Charles Hoskinson, the network’s founder, after a new wave of criticism emerged on X (formerly Twitter). The latest controversy began when an account named “Dclay” questioned Hoskinson’s impact on the project.
The post asked, “Is Charles Hoskinson the cancer of Cardano? Would this chain be a lot better without him being as active as he is? Is he just too emotional?” This sparked heated exchanges among community members.
Another user echoed the sentiment, claiming, “The biggest enemy of Cardano is Hoskinson; he’s done more harm than good. I’ve never seen a blockchain with this much drama.”
However, these comments quickly met with backlash from loyal supporters of the Cardano Community, who highlighted Hoskinson’s contributions and leadership. “I disagree; Charles is making a significant contribution to Cardano and the overall crypto industry. We need more builders and long-term thinkers like Charles,” one supporter argued.
Cardano Community Claps Back at Critic Who Labeled Charles Hoskinson A “Cancer” For ADA #Cardano #CardanoFeed #trading #ADA #crypto #CardanoCommunity #bitcoin #blockchain #governance #cryptocurrency #CardanoADA #btc $ADA https://t.co/IXda1tGIw2
— Cardano Feed ($ADA) (@CardanoFeed) November 4, 2024
Charles Hoskinson Responds, Cardano Community Split
In response to the criticism, Charles Hoskinson launched a poll on X, posing the question, “Is Charles Hoskinson a cancer for Cardano?” The preliminary results showed that 57.1% of respondents disagreed, while a significant 42.9% agreed, showcasing a split within the Cardano Community.
Hoskinson took the opportunity to discuss the growing culture of personal attacks on social media platforms like X. He highlighted how these platforms have become toxic spaces, stating, “We somehow think it’s acceptable to call people cancer, a criminal, or evil. The worst part is that the victims are told they can’t fight back. It’s an endless cycle.”
Following this, Hoskinson announced a strategic change in how he engages with the Cardano Community, indicating he would use X less frequently and focus on more thoughtful, curated interactions.
“I’m going to take a different approach to how I communicate with the Cardano ecosystem, using X less and focusing on more productive and curated mediums,” he tweeted.
Cardano Community and the Push for Decentralized Governance
This controversy once again sheds light on the Cardano Community’s ongoing efforts to strengthen decentralized governance.
Although Hoskinson’s defenders emerged victorious in the poll, the 43% dissatisfaction rate signals a critical divide. Many critics argue that Hoskinson’s influence is too centralized, a point Cardano has been actively working to address.
The Voltaire era marks a significant step in the journey toward complete decentralization. Initiatives like CIP-1694 are designed to empower the Cardano Community by outlining comprehensive on-chain governance structures.
Moreover, the Cardano Constitution will serve as a guiding framework, promoting transparency and inclusivity. Another key player, Intersect, will manage off-chain governance, ensuring long-term sustainability for the ecosystem. These measures aim to put more control into the hands of the Cardano Community and reduce any perceived centralization around Hoskinson.
Despite the weekend drama, ADA’s market performance remained relatively stable. The token was trading at $0.327 at press time, showing a minor 0.73% decline over the past 24 hours. Whether Cardano’s decentralization efforts will unite the community or continue to expose divides remains to be seen.
