NewsCrypto

$70M UPCX Hack Exposes Major Security Flaw in ProxyAdmin

$70M UPCX Hack Exposes Major Security Flaw in ProxyAdmin
$70M UPCX Hack Exposes Major Security Flaw in ProxyAdmin

Key Points

  • Hackers exploited UPCX’s ProxyAdmin contract, stealing $70M worth of tokens.
  • 18.4 million UPC tokens takenโ€”over 4x the current supply.
  • Tokens remain unmoved, suggesting difficulty in liquidating.
  • The breach hasn’t affected the broader crypto market.

The UPCX hack is raising eyebrows across the crypto community. On April 1, 2025, UPCX confirmed it suffered a massive breach resulting in the theft of 18.4 million UPC tokensโ€”a staggering $70 million worth.

The shocking part? The stolen tokens far exceed the projectโ€™s total circulating supplyโ€”which currently sits around 4 million UPC. This means the attacker now controls more than four times the active market liquidity, putting UPCX in an extremely vulnerable position.

The breach was tracked by blockchain security firm Cyvers, who identified unauthorized actions involving UPCXโ€™s ProxyAdmin contract. This contract governs key upgrades and permissions across the platform. The hacker upgraded the ProxyAdmin and triggered a function called withdrawByAdmin, allowing them to siphon tokens from three separate management wallets.

So far, none of the stolen tokens have been moved. While that may seem like good news, it also signals that the hacker might be waiting for the perfect timeโ€”or methodโ€”to liquidate without crashing the tokenโ€™s already fragile price.

In the bigger picture, this incident comes at a time when the crypto market is already navigating shaky ground. Coinbaseโ€™s worst quarter since the FTX collapse and Bitcoinโ€™s Q1 2025 crash are just a few recent signs of growing volatility.

ProxyAdmin Exploit Raises Red Flags for DeFi Security

This UPCX hack isnโ€™t just about the moneyโ€”itโ€™s about trust and architecture. Many DeFi and crypto projects rely on upgradeable smart contracts, often controlled by centralized admin contracts like ProxyAdmin. While designed for flexibility and improvement, these contracts can become a single point of failure if not secured properly.

UPCX, which markets itself as an open-source, user-friendly crypto payment system, now faces a steep uphill climb. Although the team has mentioned applying additional security measures post-hack, no clear roadmap or technical analysis has been released to show how future exploits will be prevented.

The issue also sheds light on broader problems plaguing Web3 security. Other recent incidents, like the mysterious burn address tweet from CZ and token transfer confusion, show how lack of clarity and control continues to disrupt the space.

The fallout from the UPCX hack also brings to mind other big market shifts. For example, MicroStrategy’s relentless Bitcoin acquisition still manages to influence sentiment positively, even as security threats like this continue to expose weaknesses in smaller projects.

No Token Movement, but the Threat Still Lurks

A curious detail in this hack is that none of the stolen UPC tokens have been moved or launderedโ€”yet. That could mean the hacker is waiting for the right moment to cash out. However, moving such a large quantity could crash the token price further, effectively reducing the potential gains.

With only a handful of holders and limited exchange listings, UPCX doesnโ€™t have the liquidity depth to absorb even a fraction of the stolen funds. If an attempt is made to sell, the price could nosedive in minutes. This could be one reason for the current inactivity in the hackerโ€™s wallet.

On social media, UPCX’s post about the hack has received little attention, with under 10,000 viewsโ€”a surprisingly low number considering the size of the theft. That suggests UPCXโ€™s community and visibility are still relatively small, further limiting its ability to mount a strong recovery.

UPCX (UPC) Price Performance. Source: CoinGecko - Techtoken

UPCX (UPC) Price Performance. Source: CoinGecko – Techtoken

The hackerโ€™s silent approach mirrors tactics seen in other crypto scandals. Some speculate the attacker might use privacy tools or even NFTs to launder assets, while others believe it could be an inside job.

As the market digests this event, attention may shift to how UPCX responds. Will they attempt a token reissue? Will they engage with authorities to freeze the hacker’s wallet? Either way, the projectโ€™s next steps are critical.

The attack also indirectly affects ongoing trends in the crypto community. For example, as investors look for more secure blockchain projects, attention may increase on use cases like crypto-funded space exploration or Bitcoinโ€™s growing role in U.S. politics.

Smaller, newer projects like UPCX will now face even more scrutiny. The pressure is on to prove that open-source innovation can go hand in hand with security.

What's your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
Abhijeet
Abhijeet is a Web3 and crypto writer who brings blockchain concepts to life with simple, engaging, and SEO-driven content. From DeFi and NFTs to emerging blockchain trends, he crafts stories that resonate with readers and build authority for Web3 brands.

    You may also like

    More in:News

    Leave a reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *