NewsTechnology

US demands Nvidia sales cut could unlock $2B yearly

US demands Nvidia sales cut could unlock $2B yearly
US demands Nvidia sales cut could unlock $2B yearly

Key Points

  • US demands Nvidia sales cut could bring $2B yearly
  • US orders Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% commission on AI chip sales to China
  • Trump negotiated the deal directly with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang
  • Approved chips are downgraded to meet US export rules
  • Policy could set a new precedent in tech trade deals

The US government has taken an unprecedented step in tech trade policy, demanding a 15% cut of AI chip sales revenue to China from industry leaders Nvidia and AMD.

According to reports from The New York Times and The Financial Times, the agreement was finalized just days before the Commerce Department granted the companies licenses to resume shipments.

President Donald Trump confirmed the deal during a press conference, revealing that he initially pushed for a 20% share before Nvidiaโ€™s CEO Jensen Huang bargained it down.

โ€œI said, โ€˜I want 20 percent if Iโ€™m going to approve this for you, for the country,โ€™โ€ Trump said. โ€œAnd he [Huang] said, โ€˜Would you make it 15?โ€™ So we negotiate a little deal.โ€

This unusual approach adds to a list of unpredictable revenue-generating moves from the administration,ย  including tariffs, settlements, and even AI-related policy pushes similar to those seen in the GPT-5 rollout challenges.

Chips approved but scaled down for China

The shipments greenlit under this arrangement include Nvidiaโ€™s H20 and AMDโ€™s MI308, ย both AI-focused GPUs that have been intentionally downgraded to comply with strict US export rules. The modifications limit computing capabilities, ensuring they donโ€™t cross thresholds set by national security guidelines.

The sales were originally blocked after the April export restrictions targeting AI chips. However, both companies announced in July that they would soon resume exports once licenses were secured.

Nvidiaโ€™s H20 chip has recently faced scrutiny from Beijing, with Chinese regulators claiming it might contain a government โ€œbackdoorโ€.

Trump dismissed these claims, saying the H20 is โ€œan old chip that China already has.โ€ He even hinted that the Blackwell chip, Nvidiaโ€™s next-gen GPU, could be approved for export if its performance was reduced by โ€œ30 to 50 percent.โ€

This practice of creating specialized export versions isnโ€™t new; Apple has followed similar strategies in its chip technology development to meet varying regional regulations, though without direct government profit-sharing.

Billions in new revenue for the US

The 15% commission could yield $2 billion annually for the US Treasury, making it more than just a political move; itโ€™s a fiscal one.

Analysts point out that the Trump administration has consistently experimented with unconventional economic tactics, whether through tariffs, licensing fees, or high-profile tech negotiations.

The Times called the deal โ€œhighly unusualโ€, noting that it follows a series of headline-grabbing policy shifts. For example, the president recently threatened a 100% tariff on semiconductors unless manufacturers bring production to the US.

The decision also plays into the global AI race, where regulatory power can dictate market dominance. Similar debates have been sparked by the emergence of AI-generated content tools, where governments are considering whether to tax or restrict certain technologies.

A precedent for future tech trade deals?

This deal could set the stage for a new trade model where the US allows certain exports but takes a direct share of revenue. Unlike a simple tariff, this structure creates an ongoing profit stream tied directly to sales volume,ย  a move that could appeal to policymakers but unsettle multinational corporations.

It also reflects a growing trend where technology companies are increasingly caught in the middle of geopolitical rivalries. From software platforms to semiconductor giants, no part of the tech world seems immune.

Even companies far from the chip industry,ย  like those affected by the Microsoft Lens retirement, are finding that government decisions can reshape entire product strategies.

Meanwhile, Chinaโ€™s own AI development continues rapidly. While export restrictions slow access to the most advanced US-made chips, domestic chipmakers are racing to fill the gap.

The downgrade of Nvidiaโ€™s and AMDโ€™s offerings may give Chinese competitors room to grow,ย  but at the cost of falling behind in top-tier AI performance.

With AIโ€™s role expanding beyond computing into areas like healthcare, security, and finance, the competition for chip supremacy is becoming as strategic as the space race once was. In some ways, it mirrors the tensions seen when GPT-5 leak reports surfaced, hinting at AI capabilities that could give one side a major advantage.

The bigger picture

Ultimately, this deal reflects a blending of trade policy and tech regulation in a way rarely seen before. By directly linking export permissions to revenue-sharing, the US is testing a new form of economic leverage in the AI era.

Whether other industries will see similar arrangements remains to be seen. But if AI chips are any indication, the era of hands-off government in high-tech global sales may be ending.

What's your reaction?

Excited
0
Happy
0
In Love
0
Not Sure
0
Silly
0
Ashlesha
Ashlesha is a dynamic AI and tech writer with 3+ years of experience and a passion for exploring cutting-edge innovations. With a knack for simplifying complex technologies like machine learning, robotics, and cloud computing, she crafts engaging, SEO-friendly articles that inform and inspire.

    You may also like

    More in:News

    Leave a reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *